Buy your weekday smoothies and get your weekend ones for free. (7 for the price of 5!)
WELLNESSWEEK
Introduction — Why This Conversation Matters Today
For most of human history, people understood something we have largely forgotten: the blood of an animal is the most biologically dangerous substance you can consume. Long before modern food science, ancient societies observed that meat containing blood spoiled faster, carried disease more readily, and made people sick more often than well-drained meat. Scripture captured this biological truth thousands of years before microbiology could explain it.
In Leviticus, God states:
“The life of the flesh is in the blood.” — Leviticus 17:11
To a modern reader, that verse may sound poetic. But from a biological standpoint, it is literal. Blood is where parasites circulate during key phases of their lifecycle, where bacteria multiply when an animal experiences stress or illness, where many viruses replicate before spreading to tissues, and where toxins, heavy metals, and metabolic waste are transported. It also carries inflammatory compounds and immune mediators that reflect what the animal has gone through in its environment.
In other words, blood is the highway of everything that sustains life—and everything that can threaten it. When animals are slaughtered in ways that trap blood inside their tissues, the meat retains far more biological burden than most consumers realize. It spoils more rapidly, provides a richer medium for bacterial growth, and potentially carries a higher load of blood-borne parasites and contaminants than meat that has been thoroughly drained.
The Bible’s prohibition against consuming blood therefore has two layers of meaning. Spiritually, blood represents life, atonement, and sacredness—a domain belonging to God alone. Biologically, blood is the part of an animal most likely to harbor dangers that the eye cannot see. Both dimensions matter, and both still apply today.
Modern industrial slaughter practices often work against the natural physiology of the animal. Stunning methods halt circulation before the body has time to drain properly. Blood remains trapped in muscle, organs, and connective tissue. Even USDA Organic meat follows the same slaughter rules, which means that “organic” does not automatically equate to “low in blood-borne parasites or pathogens.”
In contrast, kosher slaughter—unchanged for millennia—is designed from the ground up to remove blood as thoroughly as possible. The ancient Hebrew method aligns strikingly with what modern science now shows to be biologically protective. When you pair kosher slaughter with pasture-raised, hormone-free farming, you get one of the cleanest and safest meat options available today.
In the sections that follow, we will explore why blood is biologically dangerous, which parasites depend on it, how kosher slaughter physically removes much of this risk, how organic and conventional systems compare, and why biblical dietary principles continue to reflect deep biological insight. This is not a debate between theology and science. It is an illustration of how Scripture anticipated scientific truth long before laboratories existed.
The Biblical Foundation: “The Life Is in the Blood” (And Why That Matters Biologically)
Few biblical statements are as theologically rich and scientifically accurate as the claim that the life of the flesh is in the blood. This idea appears throughout Scripture and forms the backbone of the biblical prohibition against consuming blood. It is introduced in God’s covenant with Noah, codified in the Law given to Israel, and reaffirmed by the early church for Gentile believers in the New Testament.
“For the life of the flesh is in the blood.” — Leviticus 17:11
In Genesis 9, God addresses all humanity through Noah, commanding that people must not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood. Later, in Leviticus 17, the prohibition is repeated several times with strong language: anyone who eats blood is cut off from the community. Deuteronomy again warns God’s people not to consume blood, emphasizing that the blood is the life. Historical narratives such as 1 Samuel 14 describe eating meat with the blood as sin, and prophetic passages like Ezekiel 33 rebuke people for this practice. Finally, in Acts 15, when the apostles discern which core requirements apply to Gentile Christians, abstaining from blood and from meat of strangled animals is explicitly included.
This cluster of passages shows that the biblical stance on blood is not a minor or purely cultural detail. The entire storyline treats blood as something sacred that does not belong in the human diet. The life of the creature is in its blood, and life belongs to God. Consuming blood is portrayed as crossing a boundary between what is permitted and what is reserved for God, and in many cultures around Israel it was linked to occult practices, witchcraft, and spiritual manipulation.
🩸 Blood as the Vehicle of Life and Disease
When Scripture says the life is in the blood, it is not only making a spiritual point; it is also describing a biological reality. Blood carries oxygen to every tissue and returns carbon dioxide to the lungs. It delivers nutrients, hormones, and energy substrates. It transports immune cells and antibodies wherever they are needed. It carries away waste for detoxification in the liver and kidneys. In short, blood is the central medium of life within the body.
At the same time, blood is also the main highway for disease. When parasites infect an animal, many of them pass through or dwell in the bloodstream at some stage. When bacteria escape the gut or the skin, they travel through blood to distant destinations. When viruses become systemic, they multiply in and move with the blood. Toxins absorbed from the environment, chemical residues, and inflammatory molecules all circulate there as well. Blood is where the consequences of infection, stress, and exposure are most concentrated.
🩸 Blood as a Spiritual Substance
Because of this intimate connection with life, Scripture treats blood as sacred. The blood of sacrifices is given to God at the altar; the blood of the Passover lamb is placed on the doorposts; the blood of Christ is described as the means by which we are cleansed and reconciled. To drink blood or consume it casually as food is portrayed not only as unwise but as a kind of rebellion against the order God has established.
Ancient pagan religions often incorporated blood into rituals in ways that blended spiritualism, superstition, and attempts at manipulating unseen powers. Against this background, God’s consistent instruction to His people not to eat blood marked them off as distinct and protected them from practices that combined spiritual danger with biological risk.
🩸 The New Testament Confirmation
Some assume that the coming of Christ removed any concern about food laws, including blood. Yet in Acts 15, when the apostles address Gentile believers, they specifically list abstaining from blood and from meat of strangled animals alongside avoiding idolatry and sexual immorality. Strangled animals are mentioned because this method of killing traps blood within the carcass. The instruction is simple: do not consume blood, and do not consume meat from animals killed in ways that keep their blood inside.
Far from being abolished, the biblical principle regarding blood is carried forward into the life of the early church. That does not mean Christians are required to follow every detail of the Torah, but it does mean that the spiritual and biological wisdom regarding blood continues to be relevant and worth honoring.
The Science of Blood: Why It’s the Dirtiest Part of the Animal
When people think about contamination in meat, they usually picture the intestines. The gut certainly matters, but the blood is often a more important factor once the animal has been slaughtered. From the moment of death onward, everything that once made blood the carrier of life now makes it a powerful engine of decay.
Blood is warm, rich in nutrients, and full of iron and proteins. In a living body, those characteristics are tightly controlled. After death, they make blood a nearly perfect medium for the growth of bacteria, the spread of parasites, and the rapid onset of spoilage. In contrast, muscle tissue is denser, less accessible, and less chemically favorable to microbes.
Many of the parasites that infect livestock spend part of their life cycle in the bloodstream. Protozoa that invade red blood cells, larvae of worms that migrate from one organ to another, and various blood-borne stages of parasites all rely on blood as a transport system. When blood is drained efficiently at slaughter, a large fraction of these organisms and their stages are physically removed from the edible portion of the animal.
The same principle applies to bacteria and viruses. Under stress, some bacteria can pass from the gut into the bloodstream. Systemic infections often mean that viruses are present in circulating blood. Toxins that have not yet been filtered out by the liver or kidneys are carried there as well. Once the animal dies, the immune system stops working, circulation stops, and the balance that kept these elements in check collapses.
At that point, blood begins to clot, and bacteria trapped within those clots can multiply exponentially. The iron in hemoglobin accelerates chemical reactions that break down fats and proteins, producing rancid odors and off-flavors. The warmth retained in pooled blood allows microbes to double in number repeatedly before the carcass cools. The result is that blood becomes the earliest and most active site of spoilage in the carcass.
Because blood flows everywhere in the body, any contamination present in it is also capable of reaching many different tissues. During slaughter and processing, spilled or splashed blood can spread microbes and contaminants to surfaces and other carcasses. For all of these reasons, blood is not only the dirtiest part of the animal after death; it is also the most important medium to remove if the goal is clean, stable, and safe meat.
Why Blood Spoils Faster Than Muscle (Scientific Explanation)
From a food science perspective, spoilage is driven by a combination of microbial growth, chemical breakdown, and environmental conditions such as temperature and oxygen exposure. Blood accelerates all three. While muscle tissue certainly does spoil over time, the presence of residual blood makes that process faster and more intense.
Bacteria need water, nutrients, and the right pH to grow. Blood offers all three. It is mostly water, full of dissolved sugars, amino acids, and lipids, and maintains a pH that, especially shortly after death, is closer to neutral than the more acidic environment that develops in muscle. Many bacteria that cause foodborne illness or spoilage prefer that kind of environment. Once the immune system stops and oxygen levels shift, bacteria that were present in small numbers can multiply quickly in this rich fluid.
The iron in blood is another major factor. Iron-containing molecules such as hemoglobin and myoglobin act as catalysts for oxidation, the chemical process that leads to rancidity and off-odors. When blood remains in meat, it speeds up the breakdown of fats and the deterioration of pigments, which is why meat with more residual blood tends to discolor and develop sour or metallic smells sooner than well-drained meat.
Heat management matters as well. After slaughter, the internal temperature of a carcass does not drop instantly. Areas with more trapped blood cool more slowly, giving bacteria in those regions more time to grow while conditions are ideal. As blood clots, it creates pockets of semi-solid material that can shelter microbes from rapid cooling and from the effects of surface sanitizing steps.
Even the enzymes present in blood contribute to the breakdown of tissues. Once they are no longer regulated by the living body, proteases and other enzymes begin to degrade proteins and membranes. This process softens and weakens the structure of surrounding tissues and can release more nutrients that bacteria can use. In essence, blood carries within it both the fuel and the biochemical tools for its own decay and for the decay of the tissues it saturates.
All of these factors—nutrient richness, favorable pH, catalytic iron, retained heat, and active enzymes—explain why blood spoils faster than muscle and why meat that retains more blood is more prone to rapid spoilage. Removing blood at slaughter is therefore one of the most effective single interventions a processor can make to improve stability and safety.
How Modern Slaughter Retains Blood — and Why That’s a Problem
Most consumers assume that when an animal is slaughtered, nearly all of its blood is removed. In practice, modern industrial methods often leave a significant amount of blood inside the carcass, especially in small vessels, deep tissues, and areas affected by stunning. The issue is not primarily negligence; it is the way the system is designed.
In large plants, animals are typically stunned before their throats are cut. Stunning methods vary by species and facility but often include captive bolt guns for cattle, electrical stunning for pigs and some other animals, and gas stunning in certain poultry and pig operations. The intention is to render the animal insensible for ethical and regulatory reasons. However, stunning also affects the cardiovascular system. It can slow or stop the heart abruptly and cause blood vessels to constrict or rupture internally.
When the heart stops beating before the main cut is made, circulation ceases. Without active blood pressure, blood no longer moves out of the body efficiently. It remains trapped in capillaries, small veins, and tissue spaces. The subsequent throat cut drains whatever blood can still flow by gravity, but much of the blood that would have been pumped out is now static.
High line speeds add another limitation. Industrial plants process large numbers of animals per hour, and there is only a narrow window of time for each carcass to bleed before it must be moved to the next stage. Even if the cut itself is adequate, the combination of prior stunning and limited time means that complete exsanguination is rarely achieved.
The result is that conventional meat, whether labeled organic or not, usually contains more residual blood than meat processed under systems designed specifically around thorough blood removal. From a biblical standpoint, that is already a concern. From a biological standpoint, it means that more of the animal’s blood-borne parasites, bacteria, and contaminants are likely to be present in the meat that reaches the consumer.
Kosher Slaughter: What It Is & How It Removes Blood Better Than Any Other Method
Against this backdrop, kosher slaughter—known as shechita—stands out as a fundamentally different approach. It is not simply a matter of saying a blessing over an animal that has been killed in the same way as conventional meat. It is an integrated system in which the method of killing, the timing of the cut, and the subsequent handling of the meat are all designed to honor the biblical prohibition against consuming blood.
In shechita, the animal is not stunned beforehand. Instead, a trained and certified slaughterer uses a special razor-sharp knife to make a single, continuous, and precise cut across the throat. This cut is intended to sever the major blood vessels, the trachea, and the esophagus in one smooth motion. Because the heart is still beating at the moment of the cut, blood is propelled out of the body by both pressure and gravity.
This difference in timing is crucial. Rather than halting circulation first and then trying to drain a static system, kosher slaughter takes advantage of the animal’s own physiology to remove as much blood as possible. There is less internal hemorrhaging from stunning-induced trauma, fewer ruptured vessels deep in the tissues, and more efficient flow of blood out of the carcass.
After slaughter, kosher practice does not stop at exsanguination. For meat that is to be cooked, there is an additional process of soaking and salting designed specifically to draw out remaining blood. The meat is soaked in water, salted generously with coarse salt on all exposed surfaces, and then allowed to rest so that fluid is pulled out of the tissue. Finally, it is rinsed thoroughly to remove both the salt and the drawn-out blood.
From a scientific perspective, this combination of immediate exsanguination and later soaking and salting has several effects. It reduces the total amount of blood present in the meat, changes the surface environment in ways that can slow microbial growth, and removes some of the fluid that would otherwise have supported bacterial proliferation. From a biblical perspective, it is a faithful application of the command not to consume blood. The same system that honors the spiritual meaning of blood also happens to align with what modern microbiology recommends for reducing certain risks.
Parasites That Are Significantly Reduced by Kosher Blood Removal
No slaughter or processing system can eliminate every possible parasite or pathogen. Some parasites encyst in muscle tissue or organs and require proper cooking to be neutralized. Nevertheless, the focus on thorough blood removal in kosher practice can significantly reduce exposure to parasites and other organisms that rely on blood as a transport or replication medium.
Many protozoal parasites that affect livestock spend part of their lifecycle in red blood cells. When an animal is actively infected, large numbers of these organisms can be present in the bloodstream. If that blood remains in the meat, the consumer is exposed to whatever survives processing and cooking. When blood is removed efficiently at slaughter and drawn out further through soaking and salting, a substantial portion of this burden is physically taken away.
Something similar is true for the migratory stages of certain worms and flukes. Even if adult parasites reside in the gut or other organs, their larvae often pass through the bloodstream. Thorough exsanguination reduces the number of these circulating stages that end up in edible tissues at the moment of death. Good farming practices and appropriate cooking are still essential, but starting with less blood reduces the baseline exposure.
Bacteria and viruses that have entered the bloodstream are subject to the same logic. Removing more blood does not sterilize the meat, but it reduces the volume of fluid in which these organisms or their toxins are present. As a result, the overall parasite and pathogen load in kosher-processed meat is often lower in ways that are consistent with both parasitology and food microbiology.
Parasite Load Comparison: Conventional vs Organic vs Kosher Meat
When comparing different types of meat—conventional, organic, grass-fed, kosher—it is important to recognize that “cleanliness” is influenced by two main factors: how the animal is raised and how it is slaughtered and processed. Parasites and pathogens can be affected by both stages.
Conventional meat often comes from animals raised in more intensive systems, including feedlots and confinement barns. These settings can increase stress, crowding, and certain types of disease exposure. At slaughter, conventional meat is typically processed in high-throughput facilities that use stunning, rapid bleeding, and minimal time devoted to blood removal beyond standard practices. Residual blood in the carcass can therefore be relatively high, which means that blood-borne stages of parasites and bacteria may be present in greater numbers.
USDA Organic meat changes the raising side of the equation by requiring organic feed, restricting some chemical inputs, and mandating access to pasture for ruminants. These steps can improve animal welfare and reduce exposure to certain synthetic substances. However, organic standards do not require a different slaughter method. Most organic animals are still stunned and processed on the same types of lines as conventional animals. As a result, organic meat can still contain similar levels of residual blood and any blood-borne parasites present at slaughter.
Grass-fed and pasture-raised systems shift the diet and environment further, often leading to healthier fat profiles and more natural behavior. But grazing also increases exposure to parasites that live in soil and on pasture. Without excellent pasture management, animals can still carry significant parasite burdens at slaughter. Again, if slaughter methods are unchanged, the blood of those animals may still be rich in blood-borne stages.
Kosher meat, especially when sourced from animals that have been raised on pasture and without growth-promoting hormones, addresses both sides in a more holistic way. Good farming practices reduce certain stressors and chemical exposures, while shechita and the koshering process specifically target blood for removal. The result is meat that not only comes from better-raised animals but also carries less of the blood that serves as the main highway for parasites and pathogens.
Why USDA Organic Does Not Reduce Blood Parasite Risk
USDA Organic certification has value, but it is important to understand what it does and does not guarantee. Organic standards focus on the inputs used in raising animals—such as feed, pesticides, fertilizers, and certain medications—and on providing pasture access for ruminants. They do not focus on the microbiological state of the animal’s blood at slaughter, nor do they require a different approach to removing blood from the carcass.
Because organic livestock are still susceptible to parasites, and because grazing can increase exposure to certain parasites, an organically raised animal can arrive at the slaughterhouse with a bloodstream that contains parasite stages, bacteria, or other contaminants. Once there, it is typically stunned and processed in the same way as conventional animals. Stunning often reduces the efficiency of blood drainage, and organic standards do not add any extra steps specifically aimed at drawing out remaining blood.
This means that while organic meat may contain fewer residues of some synthetic chemicals, it does not necessarily contain fewer blood-borne parasites or pathogens. The label says a great deal about how the animal was fed and medicated, but very little about how much blood remains in the meat or what was circulating in that blood at the moment of death.
Grass-Fed & Pasture-Raised: The Hidden Parasite Trade-Off
Grass-fed and pasture-raised meat has become popular for good reason. Allowing ruminants to eat grass rather than grain and giving them room to move is more natural, more humane, and often leads to better nutrient profiles in the meat, including improved fatty acid balance and micronutrient content. For many people, these benefits are compelling.
However, there is a trade-off that is easy to overlook. Pasture is also home to a wide variety of parasites. Larvae of gastrointestinal worms can climb blades of grass and be ingested during grazing. Wildlife sharing the same fields can shed parasite eggs and other organisms that affect livestock. Wet areas and heavily used paddocks can build up environmental parasite loads if rotation and management are not carefully planned.
Good farmers employ rotational grazing, monitoring, and targeted treatments to keep these issues under control. But no pasture-based system eliminates parasite exposure entirely. As a result, even very well-managed grass-fed animals may reach slaughter with some level of parasite presence in their blood or organs. If the slaughter method does not focus on thorough blood removal, all of that blood and its contents remain part of the meat.
Grass-fed and pasture-raised, then, can be wonderful from a welfare and nutrition standpoint, but it does not replace the need for attention to blood removal. The best scenario combines both: animals raised on clean pasture, managed well, and then processed with methods designed to drain and remove their blood as fully as possible.
The Health Impact: Are Modern Illnesses Linked to Under-Drained Blood?
It is difficult to draw straight lines from a single factor in food production to the full spectrum of modern diseases. Human health is complex, and many variables—diet, environment, stress, toxins, genetics—interact in ways we cannot always see clearly. That said, it is reasonable to ask whether routinely eating meat that retains more blood, spoils faster, and carries more blood-borne contamination might contribute to the overall inflammatory and toxic burden on the body.
Blood is a concentrated mixture of potential irritants and triggers: bacterial toxins, inflammatory cytokines, stress hormones, residual chemicals, and more. While cooking inactivates many microbes, it does not necessarily neutralize every byproduct or compound that may influence the immune system. Over time, increased exposure to these elements could plausibly add to the load of substances the body must process, clear, or respond to.
From a Christian perspective, the more striking point may be how consistently biblical instruction lines up with basic wisdom for reducing risk. God repeatedly tells His people not to consume blood, and the early church preserves that instruction for Gentile believers. Today we can see at least part of the biological rationale behind that command. A life of obedience is not based on laboratory data, but it is reinforced when scientific understanding confirms that God’s ways are good for us in ways we could not have predicted.
The Safest Meat Is Not “Organic”… It’s Clean, Pasture-Raised, No-Hormone, Kosher Slaughtered
When all of these threads are woven together, a clear picture emerges. The terms that dominate modern marketing—“conventional,” “organic,” “grass-fed”—only tell part of the story. None of them, by themselves, address the central biblical and biological question of what happens to the blood.
Conventional systems raise concerns about confinement, stress, and chemical inputs, and their slaughter methods tend to leave more blood in the meat. Organic systems improve the inputs and environment but usually leave the slaughter and blood removal step unchanged. Grass-fed and pasture-raised systems improve diet and welfare but may increase certain parasite exposures if blood is not then thoroughly removed.
The most coherent approach for someone who wants to honor God’s Word and take modern biology seriously is to seek out meat that combines several priorities at once: animals raised on clean pasture with no growth-promoting hormones, managed well to reduce stress and parasites, and then slaughtered according to kosher practice, including thorough exsanguination and a deliberate process of soaking and salting to remove residual blood.
That kind of meat is not yet the norm, and it may take extra effort to find. But it represents one of the clearest ways to align diet with both Scripture and science. It treats the blood as God says it should be treated, removes the medium that carries much of the biological risk in an animal, and restores a measure of sanity and reverence to the way we think about eating flesh.
In a world full of confusing labels and shifting standards, returning to the simple truth that “the life is in the blood” and acting accordingly is a powerful way to practice both faith and wisdom at the table.
References
Sabow, A. B., Sazili, A. Q., Zulkifli, I., Goh, Y. M., Ab Kadir, M. Z. A., & Abdulla, N. R. (2016). Bleeding efficiency, microbiological quality and oxidative stability of meat from goats subjected to slaughter without stunning in comparison with different methods of pre-slaughter electrical stunning. Animal Science Journal, 87(12), 1490–1500. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12577
Nakyinsige, K., Sazili, A. Q., Aghwan, Z. A., Zulkifli, I., Goh, Y. M., Abu Bakar, F., ... & Bruijn, N. (2014). Bleeding efficiency and meat oxidative stability and microbiological quality of New Zealand white rabbits subjected to halal slaughter without stunning and gas stun-killing. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 27(3), 406–413. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093272/
Warriss, P. D. (1984). Exsanguination of animals at slaughter and the residual blood content of meat. The Veterinary Record, 115(12), 292–295. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6495586/
Öztekin, C., & Candogan, K. (2015). A comparison of bleeding efficiency, microbiological quality and lipid oxidation in goats subjected to conscious halal slaughter and slaughter following minimal anesthesia. Meat Science. (No stable public DOI link available)
Osborne, R. C., Poolperm, J., Chinander, M., & Owens, C. M. (2023). Impact of stunning and exsanguination methods on blood loss in broilers. Poultry Science, 102(6), 102570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102570
Alvarez, C., Koolman, L., Whelan, M., & Moloney, A. (2022). Effect of pre-slaughter practices and early post-mortem interventions on sheep meat tenderness and its impact on microbial status: A review. Foods, 11(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11020181
Lawrie, R. A., & Ledward, D. A. (2006). Lawrie’s Meat Science (7th ed.). Woodhead Publishing. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9781845691592/lawries-meat-science
Gill, C. O. (2004). Microbiological conditions of meats from animals slaughtered by the halal method. Meat Science, 67(4), 549–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.01.016
Pearson, A. M., & Dutson, T. R. (1995). Fundamentals of Meat Science. (No stable link available)
Taylor, M. A., Coop, R. L., & Wall, R. L. (2016). Veterinary Parasitology (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Veterinary+Parasitology%2C+4th+Edition-p-9780470670428
Radostits, O. M., Gay, C. C., Hinchcliff, K. W., & Constable, P. D. (2007). Veterinary Medicine: A Textbook of the Diseases of Cattle, Horses, Sheep, Pigs, and Goats. (Elsevier). (No stable link available)
